United States
Hong KongDividend options, and why they are not nonforfeiture options
A participating policy can pay a dividend, and the owner chooses what to do with it: take cash, reduce the next premium, leave it to accumulate at interest, buy paid-up additions, or buy one-year term. Dividends are a return of overcharged premium, which is why they are not taxed as income.
Start with what a dividend is, because the exam tests it directly and most people guess wrong. It is not profit-sharing and it is not investment return. It is a refund. The insurer charged more premium than it turned out to need, and it is giving the excess back.
That definition carries the tax answer with it. Money returned to you is not income, so the dividend itself is not taxable. Interest earned on a dividend left with the insurer is.
Participating and nonparticipating
Only a participating policy pays dividends, and participating policies are typically issued by mutual insurers, which are owned by their policyholders. A nonparticipating policy from a stock insurer pays no dividends and normally charges a lower premium to begin with. That is the trade, and it is a clean exam question in its own right.
A dividend depends on the insurer's mortality, expense and interest experience, and no contract promises one. An illustration showing dividends is showing a projection. Any stem that treats a dividend as a contractual entitlement is wrong, and this is examinable on its own.
The five options
| Option | What happens | Effect on coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Cash | A check to the owner | None |
| Premium reduction | Applied against the next premium due | None |
| Accumulate at interest | Left with the insurer, earning interest | None, but the interest is taxable |
| Paid-up additions | Buys small blocks of fully paid permanent coverage | Death benefit and cash value both rise |
| One-year term | Buys a year of term coverage, often up to the cash value | Death benefit rises for one year only |
Paid-up additions is the option the exam likes most, because it is the one that does two things at once: it adds death benefit and it adds cash value, and those additions themselves earn dividends in later years. It is also the most commonly recommended option in practice, which makes it a plausible key.
The separation from nonforfeiture
| Dividend options | Nonforfeiture options | |
|---|---|---|
| When they arise | The insurer declares a dividend | The owner stops paying premiums |
| Policy status | In force and being paid for | Premiums have stopped |
| Available on | Participating policies only | Any policy with cash value |
| The paid-up item | Paid-up additions, extra coverage bought with a dividend | Reduced paid-up, the whole policy converted |
| The term item | One-year term, bought with a dividend | Extended term, bought with the whole cash value |
Two lists, five similar-sounding items, one difference that decides everything: is the policy still being paid for? If yes, you are in dividends. If no, you are in nonforfeiture. We take the other side of that pair in nonforfeiture options explained.
The owner of a participating whole life policy wants her dividends to increase both her death benefit and her cash value permanently, without further underwriting. Which option?
- One-year term
- Paid-up additions
- Accumulate at interest
- Reduced paid-up
Where it sits and what it is worth
- Section
- II, riders, provisions, options and exclusions, 15 questions
- Listed as
- Provisions and options: dividends and dividend options
- Outline's own wording
- Participating and nonparticipating are named in the sub-item
- Cross-reference
- Tax treatment of dividends appears again in section IV
That last row is worth acting on. Section IV covers the tax treatment of premiums, proceeds and dividends, so the tax fact you learn here is worth a mark in two places. Dividend not taxable as a return of premium, interest on an accumulated dividend taxable.
The opinion, and the concession
Learn dividends and nonforfeiture in the same sitting, in the same table, or do not bother learning either. Kept apart they are two lists of five plausible-sounding elections and the mind blurs them within a week. Put side by side they take twenty minutes and stay put. This is the clearest instance on the paper of a pair that is easy together and hard alone.
The concession: dividend scales, how much a policy actually pays, are the insurer's own numbers and vary every year. We publish none, because we hold none. What the exam asks is which option produces which effect, and that does not depend on the size of the dividend.
Common questions
Are life insurance dividends taxable?
The dividend itself is not, because it is treated as a return of premium that was overcharged rather than as income. Interest credited on a dividend left with the insurer under the accumulate at interest option is taxable. That split is examinable in section II and again in the tax content of section IV.
What are paid-up additions?
Small blocks of fully paid permanent insurance bought with a dividend. They increase both the death benefit and the cash value, they need no further underwriting, and they earn dividends themselves in later years. It is the dividend option that compounds, which is why stems describe it as permanent growth.
Which policies pay dividends?
Participating policies, which are typically issued by mutual insurers owned by their policyholders. Nonparticipating policies from stock insurers pay no dividends and usually carry a lower premium instead. A stem that describes a nonparticipating contract has ruled out every dividend option in one word.
Is a dividend guaranteed?
No. It depends on the insurer's mortality, expense and investment experience for the year, and no contract promises one. Illustrations that show dividends are showing projections. Treating a dividend as a contractual entitlement is a testable error, not just a matter of emphasis.