When a Food Employee Must Report an Infected Wound
Under the FDA Food Code model, a food employee must report an open or draining pus-containing lesion such as an infected wound to the person in charge when it is on the hands or wrists, exposed portions of the arms, or another body area.
More key points
- The permitted cover depends on location: a hand or wrist lesion needs an impermeable cover plus a single-use glove; an exposed-arm lesion needs an impermeable cover; other locations need a dry, durable, tight-fitting bandage.
On this page12 sections
- Which wounds must be reported
- The required protection depends on location
- Why a glove alone is not enough for a hand wound
- The person in charge decides how to control the risk
- Common exam traps
- Key takeaway
- A practical decision sequence
- Apply the location-specific cover correctly
- Worked scenario: a draining finger lesion
- Separate the wound rule from illness reporting
- Prevention and verification at the station
- Task assignment and follow-up
An infected wound can contaminate food or food-contact surfaces. The Food Code therefore treats its location and protection as important details. In an exam question, do not stop at “cover the wound”: determine whether it is open or draining and where it is located.
Which wounds must be reported
The model code addresses a lesion containing pus, such as a boil or infected wound, that is open or draining. The food employee or conditional employee must report the relevant health information to the person in charge so the risk of foodborne disease transmission can be reduced. A closed lesion that is not draining does not fit this specific description, though other workplace or local requirements may still apply.
The required protection depends on location
- Hand or wrist: use an impermeable cover, such as a finger cot or stall, and wear a single-use glove over the cover.
- Exposed portion of an arm: protect the lesion with an impermeable cover.
- Another part of the body: cover it with a dry, durable, tight-fitting bandage.
Why a glove alone is not enough for a hand wound
For a hand or wrist lesion, the model-code requirement combines an impermeable wound cover with a single-use glove. The cover protects the lesion; the glove adds a barrier between the worker's hand and food. A glove by itself may shift or tear and does not replace protection of the wound itself.
The person in charge decides how to control the risk
The employee reports the condition; the person in charge applies the code's restriction or exclusion requirements based on the food, tasks, location, and whether the lesion is effectively covered. The employee should not decide alone that a dressing makes every task safe. The adopted local code and health authority govern.
Common exam traps
- Confusing an infected wound with a reportable gastrointestinal symptom.
- Using only a glove over a draining hand lesion.
- Applying the hand-and-glove combination to every body location.
- Forgetting that the FDA Food Code is a model and local adoption controls.
Key takeaway
Report an open or draining infected lesion to the person in charge, then match the cover to the location: hand or wrist gets an impermeable cover and glove; exposed arm gets an impermeable cover; elsewhere gets a dry, durable, tight-fitting bandage.
A practical decision sequence
First ask whether the lesion is an open or draining lesion containing pus, such as a boil or infected wound. Then identify where it is located and whether the employee works with exposed food. The employee reports the condition to the person in charge; the PIC determines which restriction or exclusion applies under the adopted code. A report is not a diagnosis, and the worker should not be asked to decide whether the wound is “serious enough.” A small-looking lesion can still drain, while a closed, dry mark may not meet the specific Food Code description. When the facts are uncertain, protect food handling while the PIC obtains appropriate guidance.
Apply the location-specific cover correctly
For a lesion on a hand or wrist, the Code requires an impermeable cover over the lesion and a single-use glove over that cover when the employee works with exposed food. A glove alone is not a wound dressing. On an exposed portion of the arm, use an impermeable cover. For another body location, the required cover is a dry, durable, tight-fitting bandage. The goal is to prevent drainage or contact from reaching food and food-contact surfaces; a loose gauze pad that can fall away is not an adequate control. Replace any dressing that becomes wet, loose, soiled, or damaged.
Worked scenario: a draining finger lesion
A prep cook tells the PIC that a finger lesion has started draining. The PIC should keep the employee from exposed-food work until the condition is controlled under the applicable rule, provide an impermeable cover and single-use glove if the employee may return to that task, and verify that the glove fits without tearing the dressing. If a reliable cover cannot be maintained, assign a task that does not create the same food exposure or apply the applicable restriction. If food or a utensil may have contacted drainage, stop the task, discard affected food, and clean and sanitize the surface before use.
Separate the wound rule from illness reporting
An infected wound is a distinct reportable condition from vomiting, diarrhea, jaundice, or a diagnosed pathogen. It follows employee-health reporting and work-control rules, but the corrective action also depends on lesion location and covering. Do not assume that a bandage automatically permits every food task, or that every lesion requires exclusion. The PIC should consider whether it is open or draining, whether the cover stays secure, the task, and the local rule. Keep the conversation private and factual, and avoid asking coworkers to make medical judgments.
Prevention and verification at the station
Keep suitable impermeable dressings and single-use gloves accessible, and train PICs to check them at shift assignment when an employee discloses a wound. A glove change is required when a glove is damaged, soiled, or contaminated; inspect the dressing at the same time. Do not store first-aid supplies over exposed food or clean utensils. The manager can document the work assignment and control used under the establishment's illness policy, while limiting access to personal health information. If the lesion worsens or cannot be contained, stop exposed-food work and seek the required regulatory or medical guidance.
Task assignment and follow-up
If a wound can be securely covered but the employee's assigned work makes the dressing likely to loosen, change the task or apply a restriction under the local code. For example, repeated immersion of a hand in wash water or friction from a glove can damage a dressing. The PIC should confirm that the cover remains in place after the employee resumes work and replace it if it becomes wet or soiled. A wound on the torso or leg still needs a dry, durable, tight-fitting bandage under the model provision, but it does not automatically call for the hand-and-glove combination. Record the control and reassess if symptoms or drainage change.
Common questions
Can a food worker cover an infected hand wound with only a glove?
The FDA Food Code model requires an impermeable cover over the lesion and a single-use glove over that cover.
Does the same wound cover apply to every body area?
No. The model code sets different protection based on whether the lesion is on the hand or wrist, an exposed arm, or another body area.