Sitonce
Country: HK
Show exams for United States Hong Kong
Sign in
Practice and exam technique

A worked life insurance question

Compiled by the Sitonce editorial team from the Texas Insurance Code, the Texas Department of Insurance's own licensing pages and FY2025 examination report, and Pearson VUE's published content outlines and candidate handbookUpdated 7 min readFacts verified 6 September 2026
The short answer

Three worked items, all written by us. Each shows where its wrong options come from: the other half of a rider pair, a dividend option wearing a nonforfeiture option's vocabulary, and a true statement that answers a question nobody asked. None reproduces a real exam question.

Every question below was written for this site against the published content outline. None is a Pearson item, none is paraphrased from anyone's course, and we have not seen a live form. What they demonstrate is how the wrong options get built, which is the part worth studying.

Life sections in the outline
Types of policies, and riders and provisions
Questions between them
15 and 15
Share of the general portion
30 of 100
Options per item
4
These three
Written by us, not sat by us

Question one: whose incapacity is it

Life policy riders, provisions, options and exclusions

A father applies for a whole life policy on his ten-year-old daughter. He is the policyowner and pays the premiums; his daughter is the insured. Three years later the father dies. Which rider, if attached, keeps the policy in force with no further premium until the daughter reaches a stated age?

  1. Waiver of premium
  2. Payor benefit
  3. Guaranteed insurability
  4. Accidental death benefit
Answer: B. The payor benefit rider waives premiums on a juvenile policy when the person paying for it dies or becomes totally disabled. Here the daughter is the insured and the father is the payor, and it is the payor who died. Option A is waiver of premium, which waives the premium when the insured becomes totally disabled - a real rider, correctly understood, attached to the wrong person in this fact pattern, and it is the most chosen wrong answer on items shaped like this. Option C lets the insured purchase additional coverage at stated ages without proving insurability, which is true and answers nothing that was asked. Option D pays an extra sum on the insured's accidental death, which is wrong on both the party and the event.

Look at what the stem spends its words on. Four sentences, and three of them exist purely to establish who is who. That is not padding, it is the question.

Candidates who pick waiver of premium have not misunderstood waiver of premium. They read the stem for its topic, saw a juvenile policy and a premium that stopped, and matched on vocabulary. The defense is to name the roles before reading the options: owner, insured, payor, beneficiary. Then ask which one the stem removed.

Question two: the words paid-up in two different places

Life policy provisions and options

A policyowner stops paying premiums on a whole life policy that has built up cash value. She wants to keep the full original face amount of coverage for as long as the accumulated value will support it, and she will not pay another premium. Which option gives her that?

  1. Reduced paid-up insurance
  2. Extended term insurance
  3. Paid-up additions
  4. Accumulation at interest
Answer: B. Extended term uses the net cash value as a single premium to buy term insurance at the full original face amount, lasting as long as that value will fund it. Option A is the other nonforfeiture option and it is the near-synonym: reduced paid-up keeps the coverage for life but at a smaller face amount, which is the opposite trade to the one the stem asked for. Options C and D are not nonforfeiture options at all. They are dividend options, available on a participating policy when the insurer declares a dividend, and paid-up additions in particular gets chosen because it shares two words with option A. Nothing in this stem involves a dividend. It involves a lapse.

This item is built on a lexical accident rather than a conceptual one. Reduced paid-up and paid-up additions sound like siblings and come from opposite events: one is what happens when a policy fails, the other is what happens when it performs.

The discriminator is a single question and it takes a second. Did somebody stop paying, or did the insurer pay something out? Nonforfeiture answers the first. Dividends answer the second.

Question three: true, and still wrong

Completing the application, underwriting and delivering the policy

On a life insurance application, an applicant states she has never been treated for high blood pressure. She believes this to be true. Records later show she was treated once, several years earlier, and had genuinely forgotten. How is her statement best described?

  1. A warranty
  2. A representation
  3. A concealment
  4. A material misrepresentation made with intent to deceive
Answer: B. Statements made by an applicant are representations: believed true to the best of the applicant's knowledge, rather than guaranteed absolutely. Option A is the pair term. A warranty is guaranteed to be literally true and becomes part of the contract, and describing an application answer that way is the single commonest confusion in this section. Option C requires the deliberate withholding of a known material fact, and the stem tells you she believed her answer. Option D adds intent to deceive, which the stem also excludes, and it is the option candidates pick when they read "records later show" as though it settled the applicant's state of mind. Both C and D are accurate definitions of real things. Neither describes what happened here.

Notice how much of the answer is in two words the stem uses about her: she believes it, and she had forgotten. Those clauses are the item. Delete them and three of the four options become defensible.

What the three have in common

Every wrong option above is a correct statement about insurance. Not one of them is false. They are wrong because they answer a slightly different question, and in each case that different question is one the stem deliberately declined to ask.

Which produces the only exam-day rule that matters here: finding your answer in the option list is not evidence. It means an item writer anticipated your reasoning, and anticipating reasoning is the job.

Our opinion, from having written 1,000 general questions: the life sections punish glossary study harder than any other part of this paper. You can know every definition in section 2 of the outline and still lose a third of it, because the questions do not ask for definitions. They ask which definition these facts engage.

How to work an item like these

  1. Name the roles before you look at the options. Owner, insured, payor, beneficiary. Two seconds
  2. Find the event. Somebody died, somebody stopped paying, somebody said something on a form
  3. Answer in your own words before reading the four choices, so the list confirms rather than suggests
  4. Then read the last line of the stem once more, and check that your answer responds to it

The concession we owe you: because nobody here has sat this exam, we cannot tell you the real forms are worded like these. What we can say is that they are written against the same published outline, and that the pairs the outline groups together are the pairs any competent item writer would reach for.

Common questions

Are these real Texas insurance exam questions?

No. All three were written for this site against the published content outline, and nobody here has sat the exam or seen a live form. Reproducing a real item would be both dishonest and a copyright problem, so nothing here does.

What is the difference between waiver of premium and payor benefit?

Waiver of premium responds to the insured's total disability. Payor benefit responds to the death or disability of the person paying for a juvenile policy. The stem always tells you who lost the ability to pay, and that is the whole discrimination.

Are paid-up additions a nonforfeiture option?

No. Paid-up additions is a dividend option, available on a participating policy when the insurer declares a dividend. Reduced paid-up insurance is the nonforfeiture option, available when a policyowner stops paying. The shared words are why the two get fused.

Is an answer on an insurance application a warranty?

No, it is a representation: believed true to the best of the applicant's knowledge. A warranty is guaranteed literally true and forms part of the contract. Treating application answers as warranties is the commonest confusion in the underwriting section.

Why do wrong options look correct?

Because they usually are correct, about something else. A distractor on this exam is normally a real concept applied to facts that do not engage it, so it survives every check except the one that asks whether it answers the question in front of you.