United States
Hong KongRanking questions: when every option is defensible
Ranking questions offer several defensible actions and ask which comes first. Resolve them by asking what is binding, what is irreversible, and what the planning process requires at that stage.
The hardest items on the exam, and they are hard by design rather than by accident.
What they look like
A client scenario, then four planning actions, all of which a competent planner might take, and a question asking which to address first.
There is no wrong option in the ordinary sense. Every one improves the client's position. The question is about priority, which is a judgment skill rather than a knowledge one - and no amount of domain revision builds it.
The three tests
What is binding? Which constraint, if unresolved, prevents everything else from working. A client with no emergency fund and a plan to invest a surplus has a binding constraint.
What is irreversible? An action with a deadline or a one-way door outranks one that can wait. A disclaimer window, an open enrollment period, an expiring option, a portability election.
Where are we in the process? If the scenario is a first meeting, gathering information outranks any recommendation, however good.
Where one option protects against a catastrophic downside and another improves an expected outcome, the protection generally comes first. An uninsured earner with dependants is not an asset allocation problem.
The conventional orderings
- Capture an employer match before repaying low-rate debt.
- High-interest debt before additional investing.
- An emergency reserve before long-term goals.
- Disability and life cover before optimizing a portfolio.
- Estate documents before estate tax techniques.
- Understanding the client before recommending anything.
These are defaults rather than rules. A scenario supplying a reason to depart from one is usually doing so deliberately, which is the other thing these questions test.
Reading for the deciding detail
Ranking questions almost always contain one fact that settles it - an age near a threshold, a deadline, a dependant, a health condition, a stated fear.
Find it before choosing. If none of the four options connects to a specific fact in the scenario, you have probably missed the fact rather than the question being ambiguous.
When you are down to two
Ask which one, if left undone for a year, causes the most harm. That reframing resolves most remaining ties.
And if it is genuinely a coin flip, choose and flag it. Time spent on a fifty-fifty is time not spent on a question you can actually answer.
CFP® is a registered mark of Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. We are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, CFP Board.
Common questions
What is a ranking question?
One offering several defensible planning actions and asking which to address first. There is no wrong option in the ordinary sense - the question is about priority.
How do you resolve them?
Ask what is binding, what is irreversible or deadline-driven, and where the scenario sits in the planning process. Protection generally precedes growth.
What are the conventional orderings?
Employer match before low-rate debt, high-interest debt before investing, emergency reserve before long-term goals, insurance before portfolio optimization, and understanding before recommending.
How do you find the deciding detail?
Look for the one fact that connects to an option - an age near a threshold, a deadline, a dependant, a health condition. If nothing connects, you have probably missed the fact.
What if you are down to two?
Ask which one, left undone for a year, causes the most harm. If it is genuinely a coin flip, choose and flag it rather than spending more time.