Sitonce
Country: US
Show exams for United States Hong Kong
Sign in

FINRA Series 79 format, questions, and timing

Updated 11 min read
Key takeaway

The Series 79 presents 80 four-option multiple-choice items: 75 scored and five unidentified pretest items.

  • Candidates have 2 hours and 30 minutes, averaging 1 minute 52 seconds per presented item.
  • There is no penalty for guessing.
  • The computer exam is closed book, and the appointment includes tutorial and survey time beyond the 150-minute exam clock.
On this page12 sections
  1. Question count and time
  2. What the current outline means for the exam
  3. A calculation-style example
  4. A transaction-rule scenario
  5. How to use the exam clock
  6. Calculator and reference materials
  7. What a practice score can and cannot tell you
  8. A compact timing drill
  9. Recognize different item demands
  10. Plan for a second pass
  11. Practice in exam conditions
  12. Sources

The current Series 79 is a computer-based, four-choice multiple-choice exam. It contains 75 scored questions and five unscored pretest questions, for 80 presented items in total. All appear within the same exam and the pretest questions are not identified. Candidates have 150 minutes for the exam. You should therefore answer every item as though it counts, because there is no reliable way to distinguish a pretest question from a scored one.

Question count and time

Exam detailSeries 79
Questions presented80
Scored questions75
Unscored pretest questions5, mixed in and unidentified
Answer choices4 per question
Time allowed150 minutes
Average time per presented item1 minute 52 seconds
Exam fee$395

The average comes from dividing 150 minutes by 80 items, which gives 1.875 minutes, or 112.5 seconds per item. If you divide by the 75 scored questions, the arithmetic is two minutes per scored question, but candidates do not know which five items are unscored. Use the 112-second average as a planning reference rather than a rigid timer. A short definition question may take less than a minute, leaving more time for a calculation or longer scenario.

FINRA notes that the appointment includes an additional 30 minutes for the computer tutorial and post-exam survey. That time is separate from the 150-minute test limit. When you plan work or travel around the appointment, allow for check-in and the full appointment block rather than assuming you can leave exactly two and a half hours after the scheduled start.

What the current outline means for the exam

The current outline assigns 37 scored items to Collection, Analysis and Evaluation of Data, 20 to Underwriting/New Financing Transactions, Types of Offerings and Registration of Securities, and 18 to M&A, Tender Offers and Financial Restructuring. Function 1 is nearly half the exam, but the two transaction functions together contribute 38 questions. A balanced candidate needs all three; a strong valuation score cannot compensate for leaving offering and M&A rules unstudied.

Items can ask about a definition, a rule, a calculation, or the application of facts to a transaction. Some prompts present data in a table or paragraph. Read what is being requested before calculating. A valuation problem may give net income, EBITDA, cash, debt, and share count even though only EBITDA and the enterprise value multiple are needed. Selecting the relevant facts is part of the test.

A calculation-style example

A company reports EBITDA of $24 million and its selected peers trade at 9 times EBITDA. The target has $50 million in debt and $8 million in cash. What is the simplified implied equity value? First calculate enterprise value: $24 million multiplied by 9 equals $216 million. Net debt is $42 million. Subtracting net debt gives equity value of $174 million.

An answer of $216 million confuses enterprise value with equity value. An answer of $166 million subtracts debt but forgets cash. A result of $1.56 billion may come from multiplying by 9 and mishandling the units. A quick unit check helps: the inputs are millions, so the answer should remain in millions. If the item then gives 29 million diluted shares, divide $174 million by 29 million to obtain $6 per share.

This example uses simple assumptions. On a live item, use only the adjustments stated or clearly required by the prompt. The enterprise-to-equity bridge may include preferred securities, noncontrolling interests, leases, pension liabilities, or other items if the question supplies them. Do not silently add adjustments from a real-world model when the exam asks for a narrower calculation.

A transaction-rule scenario

Consider an issuer planning to sell new shares to investors. The question may ask which offering route or document is relevant, who needs to be involved, or what restriction applies at a stage of the transaction. Start by identifying whether the prompt describes a public offering, a private placement, a resale, or a different transaction. Then ask which fact determines the rule: issuer status, investor type, filing status, marketing activity, or the stage at which the securities are offered.

A distractor may name a valid rule but attach it to the wrong party or timing. Another may describe the correct document for a public registration but apply it to an exempt private transaction. A third may state a broad principle while ignoring the exact facts. Avoid choosing an answer because it contains familiar securities-law words. Tie the rule to the transaction described.

How to use the exam clock

A 150-minute test gives room to work carefully, but candidates can lose time by treating every uncertain item as a puzzle that must be solved immediately. On the first pass, answer questions you can solve with confidence and mark items that need a longer calculation or a second look. If the testing interface permits review, return to marked items after seeing the full exam. Do not leave a question blank simply because you plan to revisit it.

  1. At the start, use the tutorial to become comfortable with the interface. Do not spend exam time relearning basic navigation.
  2. Move steadily through direct knowledge questions. Read every option because a single qualifier can reverse a legal or transaction answer.
  3. For calculations, write the requested quantity and units before entering numbers. Mark a question if the setup is still unclear after a reasonable attempt.
  4. Watch elapsed time at natural intervals, such as after each quarter of the exam, rather than checking after every item.
  5. Reserve a final review period for unanswered or marked questions. Since guessing carries no penalty, select an answer for every item before submitting.

Practice with the same discipline. A 20-question set in 37 minutes is a useful short timing drill at the overall exam pace, but it is not a precise replica of a full exam. Mix calculation and rule questions so you learn to shift gears. Review time matters too: if a 30-minute practice set takes another hour to understand, include that analysis in your study calendar.

Calculator and reference materials

The exam is closed book, and candidates may not bring reference materials into the testing session. Use the current FINRA exam instructions for the equipment and allowed materials at the appointment. Do not build a plan around having your own reference notes, spreadsheet, or financial calculator. Your study should make common calculations and definitions retrievable without those tools.

For arithmetic practice, focus on setup rather than speed alone. Know how to calculate enterprise value from market capitalization and debt-like items, move from enterprise value to equity value, apply trading multiples, calculate ownership dilution, and interpret basic working-capital and profitability ratios. A basic calculator can handle the arithmetic; the difficult part is identifying which inputs belong in the calculation and what the result means.

What a practice score can and cannot tell you

A commercial practice test may show a percentage correct, but the live score uses FINRA's exam process. The current outline explains that scores are equated to account for slight differences in difficulty among forms. Do not convert a practice score into an exact number of live questions required for a pass. Use practice performance to find gaps, and look for stable reasoning across new items rather than a high result on questions you have already memorized.

Record the question type, error cause, and repair for every miss. For example: 'Equity value: used EBITDA multiple to calculate equity value directly; add the net-debt bridge before dividing by shares.' Or: 'Offering rule: selected registration statement without identifying an exemption; sort public and private facts before applying a filing rule.' These notes help you address the cause instead of simply rereading the answer.

A compact timing drill

Try this original item without a calculator first: A buyer offers $12 in cash for each of 5 million target shares. The target also has $20 million of debt and $5 million cash. Ignoring fees and other adjustments, what is the purchase equity consideration, and what is enterprise value? Equity consideration is $60 million because $12 times 5 million shares equals $60 million. Enterprise value is $75 million after adding $20 million debt and subtracting $5 million cash.

A common wrong answer is $60 million for both measures. That ignores the debt and cash bridge. Another is $85 million, which adds debt but fails to subtract cash. The question took only a short calculation, but it required the candidate to distinguish the value paid to equity holders from the value attributed to the operating business. When practicing, explain that distinction in one sentence before moving on.

Recognize different item demands

Not every item asks for a numerical answer. A direct recall item may ask which party files or delivers a document. A short application item gives a transaction fact and asks which rule or role fits. A data-analysis item may provide several figures and ask for a metric or conclusion. The last type can feel like a long calculation even when the intended move is a one-line formula. Categorize what the question wants before selecting an answer.

Consider a scenario in which a private company wants to raise $50 million. One answer choice may propose selling new shares to accredited investors in a private placement; another may describe a registered public offering; a third may describe existing holders selling shares; a fourth might use a debt issue. The question could be testing whether you understand primary versus secondary proceeds, or whether you can distinguish offering pathways. Identify the goal and the specific requested fact. Do not infer that a private route is valid just because the issuer is private; the relevant exemption and offering facts still matter.

A deal comparison question may test a ratio or explain a consequence. If the target's unaffected price is $30 and the announced offer is $36, the premium is $6 divided by $30, or 20%. The distractor 16.7% divides by the offer price. Another distractor may calculate the premium correctly but label it as a discount. State the denominator in words before calculating. This simple habit catches many avoidable errors.

Multiple choice does not mean that four answers are equally plausible. Distractors often reflect recognizable mistakes: using the wrong value denominator, reversing a debt and equity perspective, ignoring cash, applying a public offering document to an exempt transaction, or assigning an action to the wrong party. When two choices look reasonable, return to the exact noun and verb in the question. Is it asking what the issuer does, what an underwriter does, what a shareholder receives, or what a regulator requires?

Plan for a second pass

Use a two-pass method only if the testing interface supports review and you know how to navigate it. In the first pass, do not spend disproportionate time on a question whose setup is still unclear. Make your best answer, mark it if permitted, and continue. On the second pass, reread the stem from the top, because a later fact may affect your earlier interpretation. A marked item is a reminder, not proof that your first instinct was wrong.

A useful timing checkpoint is to compare completed questions with elapsed time. Around 40 questions, the average pace suggests about 75 minutes should remain. This is a reference point, not a hard deadline, because question difficulty varies. If you are far behind, answer remaining direct items efficiently and avoid repeatedly checking the clock. A candidate who uses the first 20 minutes for just five difficult calculations may not recover the lost time.

When a calculation has several steps, write a compact path: requested quantity, formula, inputs, result, unit. For an accretion or dilution item, identify pro forma earnings and pro forma shares before calculating EPS. For an equity-value item, bridge from enterprise value. For a premium, name the unaffected price as the denominator. Each setup makes your work auditable and reduces the chance of selecting a numerically plausible answer to the wrong question.

Do not use the clock as a reason to skip every scenario. Some longer prompts contain multiple clues and can be faster than an unfamiliar formula problem. Read the final sentence to determine the task, then scan the facts that bear on it. If two choices remain, test both against the transaction stage and party. This approach is faster than rereading every detail several times without a clear question in mind.

Practice in exam conditions

Build timed practice gradually. Start with 10 to 15 questions and a clear time budget, then progress to mixed 40-question sets, and finally complete a full 80-item simulation in 150 minutes. The shorter sets let you stop and correct a concept; the full simulation tests pacing and concentration. Do not take several full mocks in a row without review. One simulation with detailed corrections can teach more than repeated score chasing.

Use the post-set review to separate accuracy from speed. For each item, note whether you answered correctly, guessed, exceeded the target time, or changed a correct answer without evidence. A candidate can score well while relying on luck or spending too long on a few topics. Stable explanation quality and adequate pace across all three functions are stronger indicators of preparation than a single percentage.

Sources

FINRA Series 79 Content Outline (2025) and FINRA Qualification Exams page.

Common questions