Sitonce
Country: US
Show exams for United States Hong Kong
Sign in

Are Pretest Questions Identifiable on the Texas Personal Lines Exam?

Updated 7 min read
Key takeaway

No.

  • Pearson VUE says pretest questions are mixed in with scored items and are not identified.
  • The current Texas Personal Lines outline lists 10 pretest questions total—5 in general knowledge and 5 in the Texas-specific section.
  • They do not affect the score, but candidates should answer every item carefully.
On this page8 sections
  1. No: pretest questions are not marked
  2. Why Pearson uses pretest items
  3. Do not skip or deprioritize a suspected pretest item
  4. How pretest items relate to the reported score
  5. Worked example: the same subject can appear in either category
  6. How to prepare for all 110 presented items
  7. Common myths
  8. After the exam

No: pretest questions are not marked

Pearson VUE says pretest questions are mixed in with scored questions and are not identified. The Texas Personal Lines candidate cannot reliably tell which item is pretest while taking the exam. These questions collect statistical information for possible use in future exam forms, and a response to a pretest item does not affect the candidate’s score.

The current Pearson outline effective September 1, 2026 lists 75 scoreable general-knowledge questions plus 5 pretest questions and 25 scoreable Texas-specific questions plus 5 pretest questions. That totals 100 scored and 10 pretest items, or 110 presented questions. Treat every question as part of your work; do not try to identify experimental items from how difficult or oddly worded they feel.

Can you identify them?
No; Pearson says they are not identified
Where they appear
Mixed with scored questions
Do responses count?
Pretest responses do not affect the score
Current total
10 pretest items: 5 general, 5 Texas-specific
Scored count
100
Practical approach
Answer all questions with equal care
Question categoryCurrent outline countEffect on score
General-knowledge scored75Counts
General-knowledge pretest5Does not count
Texas-specific scored25Counts
Texas-specific pretest5Does not count
Total administered110Only 100 are scoreable

Why Pearson uses pretest items

Pretest questions let Pearson collect statistical information about potential future exam questions. The testing program can evaluate whether an item performs appropriately before using it as a scored question. Pearson does not identify the item during the candidate’s sitting, because identifying it would undermine the usefulness of the response data.

The questions are integrated into the exam experience. A candidate may encounter a short recall item, a long scenario, a familiar coverage concept, or unusual phrasing. None of those characteristics proves that an item is pretest. A scored question can feel unfamiliar, and a pretest question can look ordinary. The candidate does not have a valid visual or content cue to distinguish them.

The total number and placement can differ across exams. The Texas Personal Lines outline states its own pretest counts. Do not use another Texas insurance exam’s count or a third-party practice test’s structure. For the current Personal Lines exam, count five in the general section and five in the state-specific section as stated by Pearson.

Do not skip or deprioritize a suspected pretest item

Because no item is identified, skipping a question based on suspicion risks leaving a scored item unanswered. Pearson’s handbook says pretest questions are unscored, but provides no method for candidates to recognize them. The rational test-taking approach is to apply the same care to every question, answer it, and move on according to your pacing plan.

Candidates sometimes believe that an item is experimental because it seems much harder than the rest. That feeling is not evidence. A difficult question may test a genuine policy distinction or Texas rule from the outline. Read the facts, identify the governing concept, eliminate inconsistent choices, and make the best selection.

An item that seems especially easy is not automatically experimental either. Many scored questions test direct definitions or uncomplicated applications. Trying to classify question difficulty consumes time and attention without improving accuracy. Focus on what the stem actually asks, whether a policy or a law controls, and which answer best fits the stated facts.

How pretest items relate to the reported score

Only scoreable responses affect the result. The exam has 100 scoreable questions and 10 unscored pretest items, but Pearson reports a scaled score rather than a raw percent correct. Pearson’s handbook explains that the scaled score is neither the number nor percentage of correct answers. The passing mark of 70 is a scaled score, not a candidate’s pretest-aware raw calculation.

A candidate cannot determine their score by counting recalled questions after leaving the test center. They do not know which items were pretest, may not remember all selected answers, and should not reproduce protected exam content. Use the official score report for the result and any diagnostic feedback the program provides.

The score is determined for the exam as a whole rather than by separate minimums for the general and state-specific sections, according to the handbook’s general exam explanation. That does not mean the candidate should ignore Texas law topics. The two sections cover different knowledge, and both are part of the exam blueprint.

Worked example: the same subject can appear in either category

Suppose a candidate sees a question about homeowners liability. It could be a scored item or a pretest item. The candidate has no way to know. They should identify the policy coverage being tested, note any exclusions or conditions in the facts, and select the best answer. The classification is irrelevant to the decision process because the candidate must respond in the same way.

Now suppose another question presents an unfamiliar Texas statutory term. That also might be scored or pretest. Do not assume the unfamiliar term means it will not count. Use the outline, recall the relevant Texas legal framework, and answer if possible. A well-prepared candidate gives every question their best effort, not only those that feel recognizable.

This approach also reduces test anxiety. Candidates cannot control which pretest item appears or whether a particular question is scored. They can control preparation, attention, pacing, and the care used to interpret each stem. Treating all items uniformly keeps the focus on performance rather than guessing the exam’s internal design.

How to prepare for all 110 presented items

Study the complete official outline, including both general knowledge and Texas-specific rules. The general section covers personal property and casualty products and insurance concepts. The state section covers Texas statutes and rules. Since the candidate cannot identify pretest items, no topic can safely be ignored on the theory that a difficult question might not count.

Practice with original questions that test application, not just recognition. Explain why a coverage applies or does not apply, and identify what fact changes the result. For law questions, name the actor, required action, timing, and exception. After a practice test, review uncertain correct answers as well as errors; a lucky guess does not mean the concept is secure.

Under timed conditions, keep a steady pace across every question. The English exam allows 120 minutes for 110 administered items, but that does not create a precise time allotment per question. Answer routine items promptly and flag a difficult one if the software allows. Do not stop to guess whether an item is unscored.

Common myths

Myth: unscored questions are always harder. Pearson does not say that, and difficulty is not an identification method. Myth: pretest items appear at the end. Pearson says they are mixed with scored questions. Myth: a long scenario must be experimental. There is no such rule in the handbook.

Myth: a candidate can ignore the 10 unscored items. They remain on the test and use time, and the candidate cannot know which they are. Myth: the score is calculated from all 110 items. The outline labels 10 as pretest; their responses do not count toward the score. The correct distinction is between presented items and scoreable questions.

Myth: a 70 scaled score means 70 correct answers. The handbook expressly warns that the scaled score is not a raw answer count or percentage. Do not mix question count, pretest status, and scaled score into an unsupported formula.

After the exam

When you receive the score report, rely on the official result. Pearson does not disclose which questions were pretest or provide exam content for review. The report is not a question-by-question transcript. If you have a concern about score data, use Pearson’s written inquiry process and include the exam name, date, and location.

If you pass, continue with TDI’s license application and any required fingerprint steps. If you fail, use the score report to direct study and schedule a retake under current Pearson instructions. Do not attempt to reconstruct or distribute live exam questions; Pearson states that examination materials are protected.

The short answer remains straightforward: pretest items are unmarked and mixed into the exam. Since there is no reliable way to identify them, answer each item carefully and base your preparation on the full current outline.

Common questions

Can you tell which questions are pretest questions?

No. Pearson says pretest items are mixed with scored questions and are not identified. Their wording or difficulty is not a reliable clue, so candidates should answer every item carefully.

How many pretest questions are on the Personal Lines exam?

The current Pearson outline lists five pretest questions in general knowledge and five in the Texas-specific section, for 10 total. They are included in the administered question count but do not affect the score.

Should I skip questions I think are pretest?

No. A candidate cannot identify them, and a suspected experimental item may be scored. Apply the same reasoning and pacing to every question rather than trying to classify the items.