Sitonce
Country: US
Show exams for United States Hong Kong
Sign in

CFA Level II Master Guide 2026

Updated 13 min read
Key takeaway

CFA Level II uses 22 short cases, each followed by four multiple-choice questions.

  • These case-and-question groups are called item sets; the case text is called a vignette.
  • There are 88 questions across two 132-minute sessions.
  • Twenty sets count toward your score and two are unscored trial sets.
On this page13 sections
  1. CFA Level II in brief
  2. What Level II tests
  3. The item-set exam and its pacing
  4. A short original example of case reasoning
  5. 2026 topic weights
  6. How to organize study
  7. Calculator and calculation discipline
  8. Results, MPS, and the Practical Skills Module
  9. What passing Level II means
  10. A realistic readiness check
  11. Connect the topics to investment decisions
  12. Build an error log that changes your next session
  13. Plan the final review around evidence

CFA Level II in brief

CFA Level II asks you to analyze an investment situation and apply what you have learned. You read a short case description, called a vignette, then answer four questions about it. The case and its questions form an item set. It is the middle exam in the three-level CFA Program. Passing it advances you to Level III; it does not award the charter by itself. Unlike Level I, several questions use the same case information, so you need to identify which facts matter for each answer.

Feature2026 Level II structure
Question format22 short cases, each followed by four questions: 88 multiple-choice questions in total
Session timingTwo sessions of 132 minutes each, 11 item sets and 44 questions per session
Scored content20 item sets are scored; two are trial sets and do not count toward the result
Average timeThree minutes per question, or 12 minutes per four-question set
Topic coverageTen topic areas with ranges published by CFA Institute

What Level II tests

CFA Institute describes the level as analysis and evaluation. A prompt might provide a company’s accounting choices, a portfolio’s risk exposures, a bond’s terms, or an investor’s constraints, then ask you to infer a valuation, identify an implication, or choose the appropriate action. The answer is rarely “recall a definition” alone. You need to know which facts drive the result and which tempting details are irrelevant.

This application focus explains why learning outcomes matter. For every module, translate the outcome statement into a task: calculate, compare, determine, justify, or interpret. Then practice that task with fresh numbers and different wording. Memorizing one worked example can create a false sense of mastery if you cannot recognize the same method when the vignette changes the reporting standard, valuation date, or investor objective.

The item-set exam and its pacing

There are 22 vignette item sets and 88 accompanying multiple-choice questions. Each of the two sessions has 11 sets and lasts 132 minutes. The implied average is 12 minutes for a set of four questions. Some sets will take less; a dense accounting or valuation case may take more. Use the average as a pacing signal, not as a rule that forces you to abandon a question at exactly three minutes.

The CFA Institute page says 20 sets are scored and two are trial sets. Candidates do not know which sets are unscored, so every vignette deserves normal effort. There is no penalty for an incorrect answer. If you cannot solve a question after a reasonable attempt, select the strongest remaining choice and preserve time for other items. A blank response gives up the chance to earn credit.

The topics can appear in either session or both. Do not rely on a fixed sequence such as “all financial statement analysis in the morning.” A vignette begins with a topic label and the set’s total point value. Read those cues, then work through the case and question wording. CFA Institute notes that the curriculum areas are randomly placed.

A short original example of case reasoning

Suppose a vignette says that Northstar Ltd. has 100 million shares outstanding, current earnings of $240 million, and a market price of $30 per share. An analyst forecasts next-year earnings of $270 million and expects a sustainable price-to-earnings multiple of 12. The analyst asks whether the shares appear undervalued using forward earnings and the stated multiple. This is an original teaching example, not an official exam question.

First identify the requested measure: forward justified value per share, not trailing P/E and not total equity value. Forecast earnings per share are $270 million divided by 100 million shares, or $2.70. Applying the stated multiple gives $2.70 × 12 = $32.40. Against a market price of $30, the estimate is $2.40 higher, or 8% of market price. Under the stated assumptions, the shares are below this estimated value.

A plausible wrong route uses current earnings: $240 million / 100 million = $2.40 per share, then $2.40 × 12 = $28.80. That is a trailing value, not the forward value the prompt requests. Another error multiplies total earnings by 12 and compares $3.24 billion with a per-share price, mixing units. A third error calculates the 8% upside as $2.40 / $32.40; that is the discount to estimated value, not upside relative to the $30 market price. A good answer depends on reading the target, date, and units before pressing a calculator key.

Now vary one fact: suppose the 12 multiple applies to trailing earnings only. The same $28.80 calculation becomes relevant, while applying it to forecast earnings would mismatch the stated convention. Level II questions often test exactly this discipline. A formula can be correct in isolation and still answer the wrong question because the analyst used the wrong earnings period, cash-flow definition, accounting basis, or required return.

2026 topic weights

CFA Institute publishes Level II topic ranges rather than a promise of an exact number of questions. For 2026, the listed ranges are: Ethical and Professional Standards 10-15%; Quantitative Methods 5-10%; Economics 5-10%; Financial Statement Analysis 10-15%; Corporate Finance 5-10%; Equities 10-15%; Fixed Income 10-15%; Derivatives and Risk Management 5-10%; Alternative Investments 5-10%; and Portfolio Construction 10-15%. The official page calls the corporate area Corporate Finance and the portfolio area Portfolio Construction.

The percentages are ranges. They describe approximate representation over an exam, not a per-sitting guarantee and not a precise conversion to item sets. Since a set contains four questions tied to a vignette, a percentage does not imply a fixed number of whole sets for a topic. In particular, do not turn 10-15% into “exactly three sets.” Use the ranges to protect study time for every area while giving the upper-range topics a larger share of your practice.

How to organize study

Successful candidates report studying an average of more than 300 hours for each level, according to CFA Institute. That is a reported average, not a requirement or a forecast of your own hours. Your starting point depends on how recently you studied the material, how much time you can protect each week, your reading speed, and whether your weak areas require rebuilding foundations. Track focused study time and performance rather than treating 300 as a pass threshold.

A practical sequence has three passes. First, learn each module and write a compact explanation of its decision logic. Second, solve targeted questions without notes and maintain an error log that records the missed fact, mistaken method, or misread instruction. Third, mix topics and complete timed item sets so you have to identify the method from the vignette rather than from a chapter heading. Revisit an error after a delay; repeating it immediately can test short-term memory instead of durable understanding.

For each vignette, practice a consistent routine: scan the topic and task, identify the decision maker and date, mark the facts that control the requested calculation, answer the four questions independently, and verify units and direction. You do not need to memorize every sentence in a case. You do need to know where the controlling information sits, and to return to it when the next question asks something different.

Calculator and calculation discipline

The exam permits approved calculator models; candidates should know the functions needed by their curriculum and practice using them. The Level II guide specifically advises calculator familiarity. On calculation questions, write down the target quantity before entering numbers. Confirm whether a rate is annual or periodic, whether a value is per share or total, whether a cash flow is nominal or real, and whether the question requests a level, change, yield, or percentage.

An efficient check is to estimate the direction and scale before calculating. If a bond’s yield rises while cash flows remain fixed, its price should fall. If a company’s earnings rise and its multiple is constant, implied value should rise. If your computed answer violates the relationship, inspect signs, periods, or denominator. For valuation work, keep discount rates and growth assumptions in compatible units and avoid rounding early when the choices are close.

Results, MPS, and the Practical Skills Module

CFA Institute reports a pass or fail result, topic feedback, and an overall scale score compared with a Minimum Passing Score. It does not publish a universal raw percentage that guarantees a pass for every sitting. Do not read a self-scored practice percentage as an official prediction: practice sets vary in difficulty and coverage, and the exam’s scale-score process is not a simple fixed raw cutoff.

You must complete one Practical Skills Module at each level to receive that level’s exam result. The same module cannot be reused at another level. The requirement therefore affects result release, not just study enrichment. Complete the Level II module assigned to your candidate record and choose one you have not already completed for Level I.

What passing Level II means

Passing Level II is a major program milestone, but it is not the CFA charter. A candidate must also pass Level III and satisfy CFA Institute membership, professional conduct, and qualifying work-experience requirements. Experience is assessed under the Institute’s current rules and should involve investment decision-making or work that informs or adds value to that process. Exam success and charter eligibility are separate steps.

After a pass, plan for the next level using the same evidence-based approach: read the current curriculum outline, map learning outcomes, and build practice around the question format for that level. Level III adds constructed response questions and a specialized pathway, so do not carry over Level II’s multiple-choice-only practice plan without adapting it.

A realistic readiness check

Readiness is best judged across multiple timed sets and topics, not one unusually strong mock or a single overall percentage. Review whether you can explain why each answer follows from the vignette, reproduce calculations with new numbers, and complete a session without leaving large groups of questions unanswered. Classify misses into knowledge, method selection, case reading, calculator, and time categories. The category tells you what to change next.

If you miss a question because you did not know a concept, return to the curriculum and rebuild it. If you knew the concept but used a fact from the wrong period, train your vignette annotations. If the setup was right but arithmetic failed, practice keystrokes and reasonableness checks. If you ran out of time, use short timed sets and set a return threshold for difficult items. This turns practice into a diagnosis rather than a score chase.

Connect the topics to investment decisions

Level II’s breadth is easier to retain when topics are connected through the work an analyst performs. A company valuation can require financial statement adjustments, forecasting, cost of capital, and equity models. A portfolio decision can require economic expectations, fixed-income duration, derivatives exposure, and risk measures. Treating every reading as a separate formula list hides these connections. After learning a method, ask what inputs it needs, where those inputs come from, and how a changed assumption affects the investment conclusion.

For example, when a vignette gives operating data and asks for an equity estimate, first decide which cash flow or earnings measure the model requires. Then check whether the accounting facts change that measure, whether the forecast period matches the valuation date, and whether the discount rate and growth assumptions are compatible. If an answer seems numerically plausible, verify that it answers the analyst’s stated task. Level II distractors often reflect a coherent calculation applied to the wrong basis.

This cross-topic approach is also useful for fixed income and derivatives. A bond valuation question is not just a calculator exercise: identify the promised cash flows, yield convention, and risk measure requested. A derivative question may ask you to interpret how a change in an input affects value, not merely recall a pricing equation. Explain the economic direction before calculating. Doing so helps catch a sign error and makes the formula easier to remember.

Build an error log that changes your next session

An error log should be brief enough that you will use it. For each missed item, record the learning outcome, the controlling vignette fact, the reason your choice failed, and the next practice action. A useful entry might read: “Forward value: used trailing EPS; highlight forecast period, solve two new P/E questions Friday.” Avoid copying entire questions or writing a vague note such as “review equities.” The purpose is to design the next retrieval attempt.

Separate a knowledge miss from an execution miss. If you did not understand why a method applies, study the concept and then solve a fresh example. If you selected the right model but entered a monthly rate as annual, practice rate conversion and mark units. If you overlooked “most likely” or “least likely,” slow down for the command word. If you ran out of time, compare time spent with accuracy; rushing everything may worsen results where the real issue is one unusually slow set.

Re-test errors after a gap. An immediate redo can be useful for learning the correction, but it does not show whether you can retrieve the method later. Return after several days with a different vignette or changed values. When the answer is correct, still explain why the alternatives fail. When it is wrong again, move the underlying concept up the study priority list instead of adding more hours indiscriminately.

Plan the final review around evidence

In the final phase, use full sessions and mixed item sets to test stamina and switching. Recreate the exam’s 11-set, 132-minute session length when practical. Review results by topic and error class, not only by the overall percentage. If repeated errors cluster in a single learning outcome, repair it directly. If accuracy is solid but completion is slow, practice the set routine and decide in advance when to make a best choice and move on.

A mock exam is a diagnostic, not a curriculum substitute. Review every missed answer and every correct answer reached by guesswork. For each, locate the evidence, state the method, and identify the nearest distractor’s flaw. This review often takes longer than the exam itself and is where the largest learning gain occurs. Avoid taking multiple mocks back-to-back without analysis; that creates scores without enough correction.

Protect rest and logistics in the final days. Prepare the permitted calculator and know the functions you use, but do not introduce an entirely new study system immediately before the exam. The candidate rules for ID, personal belongings, and test-center procedures are separate from the curriculum and can change. Follow the instructions associated with your scheduled exam. On the day, make deliberate answers, monitor time at set boundaries, and respond to every item.

This guide uses CFA Institute’s published 2026 Level II exam guide and curriculum weight table. Candidates should use the curriculum and learning outcome statements for their registered exam year because topics and learning materials can change. The ranges above are the published 2026 weights; they should not be carried into a later year without checking that year’s outline.

Common questions

How many hours should I study for Level II?

CFA Institute says successful candidates report averaging more than 300 hours per level. Treat that as a reference point, then base your plan on a diagnostic, available weeks, and repeated timed-set results.

How many item sets are in each session?

Eleven sets per 132-minute session, totaling 22 sets and 88 questions.

Is Level II harder than Level I?

It changes the task: cases supply facts shared across questions, so you must select relevant evidence and apply methods. Whether it feels harder depends on your strengths and preparation.

Does CFA Level II use essays?

No. Level II uses multiple-choice questions in vignette item sets. Level III includes constructed-response questions.