Sitonce
Country: US
Show exams for United States Hong Kong
Sign in
The paper, start to finish

How HKSI Paper 1 questions are built, and how to take them apart

Compiled by the Sitonce editorial team from the HKSI and SFC sources listed belowUpdated 7 min readFacts verified 5 September 2026
The short answer

Every question on Paper 1 is multiple choice: 60 of them in 90 minutes, with a 70% pass mark of 42 correct. Questions are built so that two options fall away on sight and the last two turn on a single qualifier - which body, which code, which Part, which category of person.

Multiple choice has a reputation for being the soft option. On a regulation paper it is not, because the format lets an examiner test distinctions that would be unfair to ask for in writing. Nobody could reasonably be asked to produce, from a blank page, which of five SFC codes governs a share registrar. Put the five in a list and it becomes a perfectly fair question. That is the whole design.

The anatomy of a question

A stem, then a set of options, one of which is right. The stem carries the conditions. The options carry the trap.

A note on how many options

Our example questions use four options, which is the conventional shape for this style of paper. HKSI does not state an option count in the material we cite, so treat the number as our house format rather than as a published fact about your sitting. Nothing in the technique below depends on it.

The stem types you will meet

Stem typeWhat it looks likeHow it catches people
Direct recallWhich body is responsible for X?You know the names but not the functions
Negative stemWhich of the following is NOT a regulated activity?You read it as a positive question and answer confidently
ScenarioA licensed corporation does X. What must it do?The condition that matters is buried in clause three
CombinationWhich of the following statements are correct?One item in the set is subtly wrong and takes the whole option with it
BoundaryAt what point does the requirement apply?You know the rule and not the trigger

Negative stems are the ones to slow down for. On a paper where you are moving at 1.5 minutes a question, the word NOT is easy to skim past, and getting it backwards converts a question you knew into a question you got wrong. Some candidates find it helps to physically pause on any stem containing not, except or least.

How the wrong options are built

Not randomly. A well-written distractor is a correct answer to a slightly different question, and that is what makes the last two options hard.

  • The right rule, wrong body. The SFC, HKEX, the HKMA and the Institute all do real things. Swapping which one does what produces a plausible option every time.
  • The right body, wrong instrument. A requirement that lives in a code presented as if it lives in the Ordinance, or the reverse.
  • The right instrument, wrong person. A rule that binds a responsible officer presented as binding a licensed representative.
  • The right answer, wrong threshold. Everything correct except the point at which the obligation bites.
  • True but irrelevant. A statement that is entirely accurate and does not answer the question asked.

Read that list again as a study instruction, because it is one. If distractors are built by swapping body, instrument, person and threshold, then your notes should be organised along exactly those four axes.

Two worked examples

Direct recall, with body-swap distractors

Which body is responsible for authorising investment products offered to the public in Hong Kong?

  1. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
  2. The Securities and Futures Commission
  3. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority
  4. The HKSI Institute
Answer: B. Authorisation of investment products offered to the public is an SFC function, and it sits within the offers-of-investments material in the Ordinance. HKEX operates the exchanges and clearing houses. The HKMA supervises banks. The Institute sets examinations. Every wrong option here is a real body doing real work, which is exactly the point.
Negative stem, where the word does the damage

Which of the following is NOT one of the SFC codes of conduct listed in the Paper 1 syllabus?

  1. Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC
  2. Fund Manager Code of Conduct
  3. Corporate Finance Adviser Code of Conduct
  4. Code of Conduct for Insurance Intermediaries
Answer: D. The syllabus lists the Code of Conduct for licensed and registered persons, the Fund Manager Code of Conduct, the Corporate Finance Adviser Code of Conduct, the code for persons providing credit rating services, the Code on Open-Ended Fund Companies and the Code of Conduct for Share Registrars. Insurance intermediaries sit under a different regulator entirely. If you read past the NOT, option A looks irresistible.

The elimination habit

Two options usually fall away on sight. That is not the exam being generous - it is how the format works, and it is why raw scores on multiple choice run higher than people expect. The exam happens in the final pair.

  1. Read the stem twice if it contains a negative or a condition. Once otherwise.
  2. Answer it in your head before you look at the options. This is the single best habit available and almost nobody does it.
  3. Eliminate the obvious two. Do it quickly and do not second-guess the eliminations.
  4. On the final pair, find the difference. There is always exactly one thing separating them. Name it, then decide which side of it the stem falls on.
  5. Commit and move. If you cannot name the difference in twenty seconds, flag it and go.

Step two is the opinion I would defend hardest. Looking at the options first invites you to recognise a familiar phrase and pick it, which is exactly the behaviour distractors are written to exploit. Forming your own answer before you read the list turns a recognition task back into a recall task, which is the task you actually studied for.

What multiple choice cannot test, and why that helps you

Here is the concession the format deserves. Multiple choice cannot test judgement, drafting, or the ability to advise a client. It tests whether you can identify the right rule from a list. That is a narrower thing than competence, and it is also a much more learnable thing.

Which means the exam is beatable by method rather than by talent. A candidate who works through several hundred well-built questions, reads the explanation for every one they get wrong, and organises their notes by body, instrument, person and threshold will pass. That is a boring answer and it is the correct one. Our practice question set is built to the shapes above, and the count of questions on the paper is the shorter version of this page.

Common questions

Are all HKSI Paper 1 questions multiple choice?

Yes. There is no essay, short answer or oral component. Sixty multiple-choice questions in 90 minutes, marked against a 70% standard of 42 correct, with no partial credit and no per-topic hurdle to clear separately.

How many options does each question have?

HKSI does not state an option count in the material we cite, so we will not present one as fact. Our example questions use four, the conventional shape for this style of paper. The technique for answering them does not depend on the number.

Are there negative or 'except' questions?

Expect them. Negative stems are standard in professional multiple-choice examinations and they are the most common way a candidate loses a question they actually knew. Slow down deliberately on any stem containing not, except or least.

How should I approach a question I am unsure about?

Answer it in your head before reading the options, eliminate the two that fall away on sight, then name the single difference between the final pair. If you cannot name it within about twenty seconds, choose, flag it and move on.

Is multiple choice easier than a written exam?

Easier to score well on, harder to bluff. The options do part of the retrieval work, which is genuinely forgiving. But the format lets an examiner test fine distinctions between bodies, codes, Parts and categories of person that a written paper could not fairly ask for.