United States
Hong KongSupporting details and textual evidence
Skill 1 reads "Identify textual evidence to support conclusions drawn from text". These items hand you a conclusion and ask which line supports it, which makes them the most mechanically answerable questions on the Reading subtest. Work from the conclusion back to the text, never from memory.
Of the 17 Reading skills, this is the one where the right answer is provably right. Somewhere in the passage there is a line that supports the conclusion, and your job is to find it.
The two shapes
| Shape | What you get | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence for a given conclusion | A stated conclusion and four candidate lines | Test each line against the conclusion |
| Evidence for your own answer | A comprehension question, then "which line best supports your answer" | Answer the first part, then locate the line |
The second shape is a paired item and it is unforgiving. Get the first half wrong and the second half is unanswerable, so if the evidence options do not fit your answer to part one, go back and change part one rather than forcing the evidence.
Supporting means what it says
A line supports a conclusion if the conclusion is more likely to be true given that line. Three failures show up as distractors.
- The line is true and on topic but does not bear on the conclusion at all
- The line supports a different conclusion that also appears in the passage
- The line supports the conclusion only if you add something the passage never says
That third one is the interesting failure and it connects to skill 4 of the same competency, which asks you to discriminate between conclusions and assumptions. A line that needs an unstated bridge is evidence for something, just not for this.
A passage argues that a district reading initiative worked. Which sentence from the passage best supports that conclusion?
- The initiative was introduced in every elementary school in the district in the same year.
- Teachers reported that the new materials were easier to plan lessons around.
- Third-grade reading scores rose in each of the three years after the initiative began, while the state average held steady.
- The district spent more per student on reading materials than any neighboring district.
Inputs, outputs and outcomes
That distractor set is worth a rule. When a conclusion says something worked, evidence has to be about results, not about effort, spending or coverage. Passages set in schools are full of inputs, and inputs read like evidence because they sound purposeful.
How to work through one quickly
- Read the conclusion and put it in your own words in five or six words
- Read each option and ask: if this is true, is the conclusion more likely?
- Eliminate anything that is about intention, process or cost when the conclusion is about result
- Between two survivors, take the one that needs no extra assumption
Step four is the tiebreak that decides most of these items, and it is the same tiebreak that decides evaluating an argument and its support under Competency 3.
Why this is worth practicing even though it feels easy
Because it is fast, and speed on this subtest is a real constraint. Thirty questions in 55 minutes is 1.83 minutes each on our division of the published figures. An evidence item you can settle in 40 seconds funds a harder inference item later in the set.
The other reason is that skill 1 is stated first in the competency, ahead of explicit meaning and inference. We would not read too much into the ordering, and we would notice it.
Common questions
What are textual evidence questions on the FTCE?
Items that give you a conclusion and ask which line from the passage supports it. Skill 1 of Competency 1 states it as "Identify textual evidence to support conclusions drawn from text", and it is the most directly checkable question type on subtest 827.
What if the evidence options do not match my answer?
Change your answer, not the evidence. In a paired item the second half checks the first, so options that will not support any of your reasoning are a signal that the earlier question went wrong rather than a puzzle to be forced.
Why are spending and rollout details wrong answers?
Because a conclusion about whether something worked needs evidence about results. Money spent, schools covered and teacher enthusiasm are inputs and processes. They read like evidence because they sound purposeful, which is why they make effective distractors.
How is supporting evidence different from an assumption?
Evidence makes the conclusion more likely on its own. An assumption is an unstated bridge the argument needs. If a line only supports the conclusion once you add something the passage never says, you have found an assumption rather than evidence.